The IAT is a psychological test that measures your implicit attitudes on a variety of subjects. The beauty of the test is its near perfect external validity. Many psychological experiments, and subsequently findings, have trouble translating to the real world. The IAT, in this case, is used to measure your implicit attitudes towards racism. You can take it here. Once, you get to that site you can take a multitude of IAT tests, but if you scroll down go the second to last one is entitled Race IAT. Take that one.
As an aside, in my final psych. lab in undergrad. we took this test after taking an explicit test about race. I scored the highest on the explicit test (by far) meaning that according to my outward beliefs I was quite racist. I think the other rich white kids were just lying about how they really felt. I was however vindicated by the IAT. I got the least biased score of anyone in the class.
There is an example given in Malcolm Gladwell's book, Blink, of a student that takes the IAT every day. And every day the result comes back that he has a preference for white people over black people. Then one day the result comes back that he has no preference. For one day his implicit racism subsides, but thereafter his IAT scores go back to showing a preference for white people. So what happened that one day that changed his actual attitudes? He watched a speech from MLK. The theory goes that when you see someone or something that you may have misgivings about doing something good or being associated with something you consider positive repeatedly it changes your implicit attitudes towards them... no real shocker there.
When Obama got elected I was excited because I thought it would improve race relations, and perhaps more importantly, help black people feel empowered. But how do you measure that? Wheres the proof for that theory? The Implicit Attitudes Test (IAT). I'd love to see those IAT scores charted for a few years before, during, and after this presidency. $20 and my right arm says there's a moderate to large sized statistically significant effect.
For extra credit: will this change the opinion of racist conservative rednecks? I think so. They'll still hate him for being black and for being a "liberal", but they'll also watch him (except for the most extreme cases) acting as the president. And over time the two will become synonymous with one another in their minds.
abraham lincoln
abraham maslow
academic papers
africa
aging
aid
alexander the great
amazon
america
android os
apple
architecture
aristotle
art
art institute chicago
astronomy
astrophysics
aubrey de grey
beck
beer
berlin
bernacke
bicycle
BIG
bill murray
biophilia
birds
blogs
bob dylan
books
bourdain
brewing
brian wansink
buckminster fuller
bukowski
cameras
cancer
carl jung
carl sagan
cemetary
change
charter city
chicago
china
christmas
church
civil war
climate change
cologne
construction
coop himmelblau
copenhagen
cornell west
cps
craigslist
crime
crown hall
cyanotype
cyrus
dalai lama
darkroom
data
dbHMS
death
design build
dessau
detail
Diet
dogs
dome
dongtan
douglas macarthur
drake equaation
dresden
dubai
ebay
eco
economics
economy
education
einstein
emerson
emily dickinson
energy
experiments
facebook
farming
finance
finland
florida
food
france
frank lloyd wright
frei otto
freud
frum
funny
furniture
games
gay rights
gdp
george w bush
george washington
germany
ghandi
glenn murcutt
goals
good
google
government
graphic design
guns
h.g. wells
h.l. mencken
hagakure
halloween
health
health care
henri cartier bresson
herzog and demeuron
honey
housing
human trafficking
humanitarian efforts
hydroponics
ideas
iit
indexed
india
industrial design
industrial work
internet
investments
japan
jaqueline kennedy
jim cramer
john maynard keynes
john ronan
john stewart
journalism
kickstarter
kings of leon
kittens
krugman
kurt vonnegut
kurzweil
lao tzu
law
le corbusier
ledoux
leon battista alberti
links
LSH
madoff
malcolm gladwell
marijuana
marriage
masdar city
math
mead
medicine
microsoft
mies van der rohe
military
milton friedman
mlk
money
movies
munich
murphy/jahn
music
nasa
nervi
neutra
new york
nickel
nietzsche
nobel prize
norman foster
nsa
obama
occupy
open source
paintball
palladium print
paris
parking
party
passive house
paul mccartney
persia
philip roth
philosophy
photography
picturequote
pirate bay
pirating
plants
poetry
poker
politics
portfolio
potsdam
predictions
prejudice
presidents
process photos
prostitution
psychology
public housing
q and a
quotes
rammed earth
randy pausch
reading
reddit
regan
religion
rendering
renewables
renzo piano
restaurants
revolution
richard meier
richard rogers
robert frank
rome
rubik's cube
rule of 72
rumi
san francisco
sartre
sauerbruch hutton
saule sidrys
schinkel
school
science
screen printing
seattle
sesame street
seth roberts
sketch
social media
soviet
sparta
spider
spinoza
sports
stanley kubrick
stanley milgram
statistics
steinbeck
sudhir venkatesh
suicide
sustainable design
switzerland
taxes
technology
ted
teddy roosevelt
tension
terracotta
tesla
thanatopsis
the onion
thomas jefferson
thoreau
time lapse
tommy douglas
transportation
travel
truman
tumblr
unemployment
urban design
van gogh
venezuela
vicuna
video
video games
wall street
war
werner sobek
wood
woodshop
woodworking
ww1
ww2
1 comment:
Hmmmmm.... interesting. Your musings/predictions about what may happen in the future are quite intriguing. I hope you're right.
After our conversation, reading your blog, AND taking the test though, I still can't shake my 'issue' with it being called 'implicit racism.' Does preference indicate racism, or is it just implicit preference because it's something known and understood? I'm trying to imagine this sort of test and what it would say if it was comparing other races, cultures, ages,...
I would be interested to know how much interaction Blink boy had with African-Americans during every day life. I'd also like to know how African-Americans score.... okay, I'm going to stop typing and start looking it up. :) V
Post a Comment