Just got back from Europe, so there'll be some posts about that after school gets a little less crazy. In the mean time here's some articles:
The FCC is trying to make broadband (internet access) a right just like water or electricity... I have some stuff I could add to that but in general this is something I've thought about and supported for years. The internet gives an individual the ability to learn about absolutely anything they want, access to any news coverage they could possibly dream of, and even the ability to speak openly. If you look back through history these are some of the most common reasons that people go to war, stat new governments and countries, and in general suffer and strive for. The fact that we can now deliver that ability with a netbook and a broadband signal is nothing short of amazing. If any one thing saves democracy/the human race it might be the internet.
Ah camera gear is so fun and addicting. It always pains me to think of myself as against owning many things but then wanting gadgets. Given the opportunity I would totally have an entire room filled with camera equipment. This is a robotic tripod head that helps you create panoramic shots. Here's the newer version that'd work with say... a medium format film camera.
There's a new social media app that forms communities based on real life proximity. I've read about these before a while ago when they were purely conceptual and being made by sociologists, but I think now they have the potential to have some interesting unseen effects. It goes like this. You have an app on your phone that is essentially like Facebook except that instead of having your usual friends it includes anyone else with the app that is within 300 feet of you. I could see this being really useful for people who move to a new city of country and don't know anyone. It oddly reminds me of Chatroulette (here's the Wired article). What fascinates me most though is the fact that if this app were to become popular wouldn't it make physical places popular too? This app wold be interesting to use from where you live of course, but wouldn't certain popular spots start to draw crowds? Won't cafes become even more popular? What if people use it to hook-up, which they will, won't the 300' radius around a 4 AM bar (around that time too) become really popular? There's a lot to think about here but it all boils down to how much this actually catches on, which if it's like anything else promising from the internet, it most likely won't.
abraham lincoln
abraham maslow
academic papers
africa
aging
aid
alexander the great
amazon
america
android os
apple
architecture
aristotle
art
art institute chicago
astronomy
astrophysics
aubrey de grey
beck
beer
berlin
bernacke
bicycle
BIG
bill murray
biophilia
birds
blogs
bob dylan
books
bourdain
brewing
brian wansink
buckminster fuller
bukowski
cameras
cancer
carl jung
carl sagan
cemetary
change
charter city
chicago
china
christmas
church
civil war
climate change
cologne
construction
coop himmelblau
copenhagen
cornell west
cps
craigslist
crime
crown hall
cyanotype
cyrus
dalai lama
darkroom
data
dbHMS
death
design build
dessau
detail
Diet
dogs
dome
dongtan
douglas macarthur
drake equaation
dresden
dubai
ebay
eco
economics
economy
education
einstein
emerson
emily dickinson
energy
experiments
facebook
farming
finance
finland
florida
food
france
frank lloyd wright
frei otto
freud
frum
funny
furniture
games
gay rights
gdp
george w bush
george washington
germany
ghandi
glenn murcutt
goals
good
google
government
graphic design
guns
h.g. wells
h.l. mencken
hagakure
halloween
health
health care
henri cartier bresson
herzog and demeuron
honey
housing
human trafficking
humanitarian efforts
hydroponics
ideas
iit
indexed
india
industrial design
industrial work
internet
investments
japan
jaqueline kennedy
jim cramer
john maynard keynes
john ronan
john stewart
journalism
kickstarter
kings of leon
kittens
krugman
kurt vonnegut
kurzweil
lao tzu
law
le corbusier
ledoux
leon battista alberti
links
LSH
madoff
malcolm gladwell
marijuana
marriage
masdar city
math
mead
medicine
microsoft
mies van der rohe
military
milton friedman
mlk
money
movies
munich
murphy/jahn
music
nasa
nervi
neutra
new york
nickel
nietzsche
nobel prize
norman foster
nsa
obama
occupy
open source
paintball
palladium print
paris
parking
party
passive house
paul mccartney
persia
philip roth
philosophy
photography
picturequote
pirate bay
pirating
plants
poetry
poker
politics
portfolio
potsdam
predictions
prejudice
presidents
process photos
prostitution
psychology
public housing
q and a
quotes
rammed earth
randy pausch
reading
reddit
regan
religion
rendering
renewables
renzo piano
restaurants
revolution
richard meier
richard rogers
robert frank
rome
rubik's cube
rule of 72
rumi
san francisco
sartre
sauerbruch hutton
saule sidrys
schinkel
school
science
screen printing
seattle
sesame street
seth roberts
sketch
social media
soviet
sparta
spider
spinoza
sports
stanley kubrick
stanley milgram
statistics
steinbeck
sudhir venkatesh
suicide
sustainable design
switzerland
taxes
technology
ted
teddy roosevelt
tension
terracotta
tesla
thanatopsis
the onion
thomas jefferson
thoreau
time lapse
tommy douglas
transportation
travel
truman
tumblr
unemployment
urban design
van gogh
venezuela
vicuna
video
video games
wall street
war
werner sobek
wood
woodshop
woodworking
ww1
ww2
16 March 2010
03 March 2010
Proof That Architects Don't Get Economics
Just super quick before I pull an all nighter and learn some BIM software... just got this is my school email:
So my tuition goes up another 6.4%. Okay... why?
"Well inflation..."
No, the CPI last year was -0.4. So in real terms my tuition is going up 6.8%. If a more common inflation rate is something like 3.5% (as in, not during these economic times) then an increase of this magnitude would yield a real increase of about 3%. Raising tuition at these levels should not be a given every year without some justification.
So what the hell?
So my tuition goes up another 6.4%. Okay... why?
"Well inflation..."
No, the CPI last year was -0.4. So in real terms my tuition is going up 6.8%. If a more common inflation rate is something like 3.5% (as in, not during these economic times) then an increase of this magnitude would yield a real increase of about 3%. Raising tuition at these levels should not be a given every year without some justification.
So what the hell?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)