WARNING: Boring Content
I just updated my post on electronic medical records. In it I had some terribly unrelated rant about the free market. I'm not sure why that was in there. I don't remember drinking while writing that, but then again I guess that would be one of the side effects. Anyways, I thought I'd expound on that rant and make sense of it. This should be a fairly boring post, but what I intend to explain is the government's responsibility to markets. Or at least my take on the governments role in the market.
First off, there are 4 general market structures. I'm going to go over them briefly, but if you really want to understand them just read their respective wiki articles.
Perfect competition: This is an economists' wet dream. The problem is that few, if any, exist. The closest examples are probably farmed commodities or eBay auctions. The characteristics that make up this market structure include: no product differentiation, producers don't set the price, and only normal profit exists. The beauty of this market structure is that the most people are satisfied with the least amount of goods. This is because equilibrium/price is found where demand meets supply.
Monopolies: Comed. Single player market, little innovation, sets own price. Fewer people get to consume the product and they pay a higher price. This results in a dead weight loss.
Oligopolists: GM, Delta. Few firms, large barriers to entry, firms set prices according to game theory (strategy based on expectations of other companies, that's why airline ticket prices are so nuts), collusion is likely because there are so few other firms in the market.
Monopolistic competition: Kraft, GAP, Crest. Like perfect competition but products are differentiated, and producers have some freedom over setting the price of their good.
So while most economists love perfect competition for its simplicity, efficiency, and fairness the reality is that it rarely if ever exists. The reality is that most markets are dominated by the other 3 market structures, 2 of which have huge barriers to entry (read: you have to have billions and political contacts) and the last which breeds advertising and brand names (Side thought: companies pay for advertising by raising the price of their product. Hence, you end up paying more for their product. Would you spend your money on billboards if given the choice? I always think about how in reality you pay for the commercials that you end up watching. It's complete insanity.). This is why economists love the idea of laissez faire/deregulation policies. In theory it works the best, but companies are run by people and sometimes people do stupid things. A perfectly competitive situation produces the most goods at the cheapest price, but the reality is that monopolistic competition dominates the marketplace - not perfectly competitive firms.
In the case of regulation, the best solution is one that stifles the market as little as possible and mitigates the business cycle (creates consistency). Here's what it all breaks down to. I think I showed why no regulation is best in theory, or at least in the right market structure (which is even funnier because the closest market to perfect competition is also one of the most heavily regulated - farming). However, in reality most markets aren't perfect and firms exist to maximize profit - not serve the greater good. Thus, markets should initially be completely free; whatever that means. The government's job is to place limits on a firms' behaviors as it becomes necessary. These restrictions will, to some extent, stunt the potential output of the economy. But they are needed to make sure that an economy can exist at all. Over time new loopholes will be exploited by companies and the government will have to enact new laws to ensure the well being of the economy.
My annoyance with all this is that people turn it into a political thing. The right screams less regulation and quotes Friedman, and the left wants regulation and quotes Keynes. It's just not that simple. Policies need to evolve over time and in step with the marketplace. I would argue that that did not happen in regard to our current mess.
abraham lincoln
abraham maslow
academic papers
africa
aging
aid
alexander the great
amazon
america
android os
apple
architecture
aristotle
art
art institute chicago
astronomy
astrophysics
aubrey de grey
beck
beer
berlin
bernacke
bicycle
BIG
bill murray
biophilia
birds
blogs
bob dylan
books
bourdain
brewing
brian wansink
buckminster fuller
bukowski
cameras
cancer
carl jung
carl sagan
cemetary
change
charter city
chicago
china
christmas
church
civil war
climate change
cologne
construction
coop himmelblau
copenhagen
cornell west
cps
craigslist
crime
crown hall
cyanotype
cyrus
dalai lama
darkroom
data
dbHMS
death
design build
dessau
detail
Diet
dogs
dome
dongtan
douglas macarthur
drake equaation
dresden
dubai
ebay
eco
economics
economy
education
einstein
emerson
emily dickinson
energy
experiments
facebook
farming
finance
finland
florida
food
france
frank lloyd wright
frei otto
freud
frum
funny
furniture
games
gay rights
gdp
george w bush
george washington
germany
ghandi
glenn murcutt
goals
good
google
government
graphic design
guns
h.g. wells
h.l. mencken
hagakure
halloween
health
health care
henri cartier bresson
herzog and demeuron
honey
housing
human trafficking
humanitarian efforts
hydroponics
ideas
iit
indexed
india
industrial design
industrial work
internet
investments
japan
jaqueline kennedy
jim cramer
john maynard keynes
john ronan
john stewart
journalism
kickstarter
kings of leon
kittens
krugman
kurt vonnegut
kurzweil
lao tzu
law
le corbusier
ledoux
leon battista alberti
links
LSH
madoff
malcolm gladwell
marijuana
marriage
masdar city
math
mead
medicine
microsoft
mies van der rohe
military
milton friedman
mlk
money
movies
munich
murphy/jahn
music
nasa
nervi
neutra
new york
nickel
nietzsche
nobel prize
norman foster
nsa
obama
occupy
open source
paintball
palladium print
paris
parking
party
passive house
paul mccartney
persia
philip roth
philosophy
photography
picturequote
pirate bay
pirating
plants
poetry
poker
politics
portfolio
potsdam
predictions
prejudice
presidents
process photos
prostitution
psychology
public housing
q and a
quotes
rammed earth
randy pausch
reading
reddit
regan
religion
rendering
renewables
renzo piano
restaurants
revolution
richard meier
richard rogers
robert frank
rome
rubik's cube
rule of 72
rumi
san francisco
sartre
sauerbruch hutton
saule sidrys
schinkel
school
science
screen printing
seattle
sesame street
seth roberts
sketch
social media
soviet
sparta
spider
spinoza
sports
stanley kubrick
stanley milgram
statistics
steinbeck
sudhir venkatesh
suicide
sustainable design
switzerland
taxes
technology
ted
teddy roosevelt
tension
terracotta
tesla
thanatopsis
the onion
thomas jefferson
thoreau
time lapse
tommy douglas
transportation
travel
truman
tumblr
unemployment
urban design
van gogh
venezuela
vicuna
video
video games
wall street
war
werner sobek
wood
woodshop
woodworking
ww1
ww2
No comments:
Post a Comment